About to vote Liberal? Wow, Tony treating you with contempt really worked.

So the Coalition’s big pitch over the last three years is that Labor’s wasted BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS and only the Liberals and Nationals will STOP THE WASTE.

And yet, when it comes down to it, when they finally shamefully slide the costings across the table at the end of the night and run off, the only way they can manage to eke out a miserable $1 billion improvement in the bottom line is by cutting $4.5 billion from foreign aid.

(And before you say, well, let’s look after our poor people first – just how much of that $4.5 billion do you think is going to improve conditions for the poor in Australia? In round figures? THE ROUNDEST FIGURE.)

$1 billion improvement in bottom line by cutting $4.5 billion from foreign aid.

So – up until that massive whack against the world’s poorest, the LNP are actually $3 billion behind Labor in managing our money.

So much for “Labor mismanagement” – the Coalition couldn’t get over the line without slashing foreign aid. And every railway program they could get their hands on. And superannuation for those on low incomes.

BTYtNMdCAAAWvm0
Did a railway once run over Tony Abbott’s dog or something?

The numbers speak for themselves – the Liberals are not the party of managing your money better, just the party of redirecting it from rail to roads, from the poorest to the wealthiest, from small business to big business.

And of course they quite cynically waited until Thursday afternoon to actually release their list, ill-defined though it is. (Which specific parts of the “Nation Building Program”, which involves things like black spot upgrades and boom gates for level crossings, are they cutting? Just what kind of “streaming” of the Family Court do they think is going to save them $30 million? What the hell does “redirect portrayal of senior Australians in the media” involve, and why will taxpayers spend $1 million on it?)

Why did they do that, if they thought you would like their plans? If, with only the day or so they’re giving you, you think you might actually like their plans, then what is it that they didn’t want you to see?

There’s no answer except that they feared that you wouldn’t like their policies if you had more time to look into them, and they’re hoping that your vote is so locked in that you’ll give them the benefit of the doubt even when they’re clearly trying to pull a fast one.

Are you really set on voting Liberal no matter what they do?

Because your power bills are up? Only a very tiny percentage of that has anything to do with the so-called “carbon tax” – 90% of it is because the states run by Tony Abbott’s party have let the power producers increase all their other charges. Because you really, really despise refugees and you really, really believe that TPVs are the magic solution that will make people give up and stay in Indonesian camps? (Or at least you don’t mind that their cunning plan if they can’t “stop the boats” is just to stop you hearing about it.) Because you have bought the line that Labor is wasting huge amounts of money – so huge that the Liberals can’t actually improve the bottom line without dipping into the small amount, compared with the size of our economy, that we spend – spent – on foreign aid?

Maybe Tony’s creepy offering of his daughters for votes appeals? Or his last minute attempt to sneak out an internet filter? (Now they’ve been caught at it the policy has quickly been deleted from their page and replaced with this.)

Look, I agree that the ALP have been a disappointing government, blowing in the wind and fighting with each other. But that’s still better than having completely insane priorities, punishing the poor and small business, and trying to trick voters like you because the Liberals don’t trust that if you found out about it you’d actually think what they’re planning to do is an improvement.

If you actually do care about public services like public transport, or seriously tackling climate change (hey, how awesome was that warmest winter on record, eh?), or treating refugees with compassion and common sense (because locking them up on remote islands is both cruel AND expensive) – then a vote for the Greens is the strongest way to use your vote to achieve that. If you want to pull Labor back from the brink of just aping the Coalition on almost everything important, only voting Green will make that clear.

But if you insist on teaching Kevin Rudd and the ALP a lesson, by voting for the Coalition in the lower house, please at least use your Senate vote for a party that will hold their excesses to account. If Abbott deserved to have a free run through the parliament, he’d have come clean about his plans well before today’s blackout. He didn’t, and he doesn’t.

About these ads

6 responses to “About to vote Liberal? Wow, Tony treating you with contempt really worked.

  1. Damn you, Jeremy. You’ve left me with nothing to say!

  2. What’s sadder is Labor’s tendency to be led round the nose by Tony as he jabs, dodges and feints. While they’ve been trying to punch out their opponent, they treated the electorate like the crowd at at WWF match. They pretended and played goodies vs baddies, never letting us in on the secret.

    Tony has fooled them while they tried to fool us, and now the joke’s on both of us.

    http://invig.livejournal.com/453528.html

  3. narcoticmusing

    I hate the idea of Tony Abbott as our PM, but seriously the ALP had it coming. Krudd had it coming. Basically, from the outset the ALP didn’t deserve to win – the only problem is that Australia doesn’t deserve Tony. However, a vote for the Tone for many would have been in their eyes the only way to guarantee the ALP were kicked out.

    I’m one of the few who do not think the ALP were a bad federal government; up until they started pretending they were the Liberal government and tried to out-do them with both meanness to asylum seekers and austerity measures that have seen our economy stagnate in a way it didn’t through the GFC. That’s right, we did GREAT during the GFC and are tanking now. Fucking austerity on a country with bugger all debt is just stupid.

    That being said, this is a democracy. People aren’t stupid just because they didn’t vote for the person/party you wanted. People weren’t “tricked” by Tony – both major parties were pretty good at the making shit up and taking stuff out of context game. Hopefully Bandt’s seat is secured – he has a great primary vote.

  4. ” the only problem is that Australia doesn’t deserve Tony.”

    Why not? It seems to me that as the second placed wealthiest people in the world (personal wealth – after Norway) we’ve just voted in a government who are going to slash foreign aid to build roads that will solve nothing. We’re a nation of short-sighted, selfish pricks, we got the PM we deserve.

  5. narcoticmusing

    That is a good point bobbyboy… I was merely meaning that we weren’t really given an alternative (if you accept there is really only two parties, which of course you don’t have to but most do).

    I was discouraged by Hockey’s rationale for the cut to foreign aid being based on our dire economic position – that we’ll help the world when we are in a better financial position. Given our ridiculously low debt and enviable position compared to the rest of the world, one wonders what the criteria is for which Hockey would think we can ‘afford’ to be nice.

  6. ” I was merely meaning that we weren’t really given an alternative (if you accept there is really only two parties, which of course you don’t have to but most do)”

    This is the thing, there are other choices, my choice is Green, others when I tell them that give me responses along the lines of they have extreme policies, to which I respond, “Which policies?” Invariably there is no answer or they just regurgitate some bullshit. The other is, they’re economic policies are rubbish, well IMO that makes them no different from the two majors.

    When it comes to extreme policies I would argue that both the LNP and ALP have extreme policies relating to asylum seekers, extreme, nasty, expensive policies that make no economic sense.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s