The present Labor Prime Minister prepares to follow the John Howard approach to refugee-bashing:
In an obvious clearing of the ground for a strong policy statement, Ms Gillard said that Australians who were concerned about asylum seekers were neither racist nor intolerant.
The new PM jumped to the defence of John Howard – the architect of the Pacific Solution and the Tampa crisis – saying the former PM is “most certainly” not racist.
Well, quite. What could be “racist” about getting hysterical about the tiny proportion of visa-less immigrants who happen to arrive in one particular way from one particular direction?
Shortest political honeymoon in Australian history.
UPDATE: The Greens and Julian Burnside QC call Gillard out:
Senator Hanson-Young says instead of having the “courage” to explain to people the truth about asylum seekers, Ms Gillard seems intent on maintaining the current state of hysteria.
“The only problem we have is that we are not treating people humanely and that’s the issue that Julia Gillard needs to address,” she said. “We are not being flooded by people – we take less than one per cent of the world’s total refugee population and yet we are taking hundreds of thousands of migrants each year for economic reasons. We are not necessarily prioritising those who are in desperate need.”
Burnside was even blunter.
UPDATE #2: The “debate” is a demonstration of why broad church parties don’t work:
The issue of asylum seekers is difficult for Labor because polls show many voters want a tougher border protection system, but that could alienate left-leaning Labor voters.
No-one can represent opposing sides of one issue. Labor is going to do its best to pretend to, and will try to convince each set of voters that it’s advocating for their concerns: but it will be a lie. The only way it could manage it would be to implement a policy consistent with its supposed human rights platform (which would involve actually representing its base for once) whilst explaining to the irrationally hysterical why their fears are misconceived and exaggerated, in the hope of changing their minds and gaining their votes as well – but that’s not how the ALP rolls. As Gillard is making abundantly clear.
PS If the Government is seriously proposing “a debate” on asylum seekers, lets hope the media give a fair hearing to the (unfortunately) only party still standing up for human rights and rationality – the Greens.
We reward politicians who display leadership on economic issues – we expect them to even. But reward politicians who race each other into the gutter when it comes to the humane treatment of fellow human beings. WTF?
I don’t understand why big party voters let them get away with it.
More leadership cowardice from Gillard.
What’s happening now reminds me very much of when Howard first got in, and set about bringing down all those things Keating had displayed leadership over. Rudd had vision, one which saw our nation better engaging with its regional neighbours. It’s becoming clearer that Gillard has no such vision – like I’ve said before, she is far more bot-like than Rudd.
I feel like I’m joining people like Andrew Elder in the ranks of the politically homeless. 😦
Confessions, homeless is a good place to be in politics. It gives you the freedom to form your own views without being corrupted by party loyalty. Just sit back and watch how the Labor Right puppeteers pull Gillards strings as she dances to their tune.
Pingback: Isn’t a vote for the Greens a wasted vote? « An Onymous Lefty
Pingback: Link dump « Spray of the Day
Pingback: Dickheads v Dickheads « An Onymous Lefty
SB, Gillard is a dirty fucking opportunist. She isn’t having her strings pulled, she’s doing what she believes is in her best interest politically.
I’m glad there is at least one party prepared to stand up against the refugee bashing. However the Greens could do a little more to help out in promote more community action, which they’re largely absent from.
Pingback: Isn’t a vote for the Greens a wasted vote? « Greens for the Illawarra
“Greens voters who were considering voting for Gillard’s ALP” < to quote someone or other, name just ten 😛