Why only 94 percent?

Okay, it’s good that the US Senate finally approved some improvements to healthcare in the country (although of course since the House of Representatives only approved a much weaker version, it’s unlikely that the Senate bill will ever actually become law).

The bill would extend health coverage to more than 30 million uninsured, covering 94 per cent of all Americans, and halt industry practices such as refusing insurance to people with pre-existing medical conditions.

But while Democrats are celebrating that “victory”, it’s probably worth standing back and asking: why only 94%?


It isn’t.

Who are the 6% of Americans, the eighteen-and-a-half million people (almost the population of Australia) who would not have health coverage, even under the strongest version of the Bill? How is it that the most “progressive” of the parties in that country can proudly trumpet “94%” as if it isn’t an obvious failure?

UPDATE: I don’t know why I was optimistic even about the Senate bill. They’ve abandoned a “public option”, too. And their version, according to Howard Dean, is actually about forcing people to join the private health insurers:

“You will now be forced to buy insurance. If you don’t, you’ll pay a fine,” said Dean, a physician. “It’s an insurance company bailout.” Interviewed on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” he said the bill has some good provisions, “but there has to be a line beyond which you think the bill is bad for the country.”

“This is an insurance company’s dream,” the former Democratic presidential candidate said. “This is the Washington scramble, and it’s a shame.”

That country is broken.

About these ads

4 responses to “Why only 94 percent?

  1. philip tr vers

    With Ob-m- sending in 56,ooo contr-ctors into -fgh-nist-n,mostly Bl-ckw-ter types with surgery techni -ues th-t R not commiser-ble with St-y -t home Med Gr-du-tes with m-ssive B-nk Debt person-lly who R you Kidding Jeremy,like these m-tters R still Bl-ck versus White? Soldiers who just get the monies -s priv-te contr-ctors to Kill, whilst the Med G-rd p-ys b-ck the B-nk? R you turning into – shit-he-d? Look into the reui-ements for these h-ppenings st-rting in two thous-nd & fourteen for the reu-ired medic-l personnel -lone?

  2. 18 million is an awful lot of people to fall through the cracks …

  3. Sure it sucks to be poor in the US, and yes, their healthcare system is barbaric and sinister, but why do lefties in Australia and Britain care so much?
    Can I propose a health topic much closer to home which deserves to get far closer scrutiny? Namely, the looming crisis in child vaccination. The moronic anti-vaccination movement has become so powerful that kids across large areas are now needlessly at risk of preventable terminal diseases:

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/09/03/2675448.htm

  4. Ouch Lefty, I didn’t know you did disemvowelings.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s