Anna Clark asks “Why Does Popular Culture Treat Prison Rape As a Joke?”
Search
Where did I come from?
The ORIGINAL An Onymous Lefty at Blogspot.
You might also know me from Pure Poison at Crikey.
And Restore, Restart, Quit, the gaming podcast.
-
Recent Comments
- Jeremy on If only the Bible didn’t clearly indicate that a foetus is not a person
- hisgracemygrowth on If only the Bible didn’t clearly indicate that a foetus is not a person
- jules on The power of the press
- jose jones (@josequixote) on If only the Bible didn’t clearly indicate that a foetus is not a person
- mondo rock on The power of the press
Pretending to be Me
Bizarrely enough, there are a few sad morons out there on the intertubes pretending to be me - commenting on other blogs as "MrLefty" or "Jeremy Sear" (using the same image of Blackadder), copying my posts into new blogs (or trying to steal my actual ones) but slightly changing the text to invert its meaning, and generally being obnoxious in an attempt to sully my good name (or pseudonym).
So if you see something purporting to be from me that seems to be completely opposite to what I argue here (for example, if I suddenly start suggesting we need tax cuts and more religion in government and I'm not being sarcastic) - then it's not me. It's one of the trolls. Please delete the spiteful hack's drivel.
Commenting Policy
UPDATE: In order to stop trolls impersonating people, commenting now requires you to create a free WordPress account (which takes all of 30 seconds).
This blog applies a "no d*ckhead" commenting policy. Vigorous debate is encouraged. People attacking each other personally isn't. If you're just making the place unpleasant, expect to find such comments summarily deleted.
Or not - I reserve the right to apply the policy inconsistently.
If you have an issue with a moderation decision - EMAIL ME. Do NOT bring it up on the comment thread in question.
-
Recent Posts
- If only the Bible didn’t clearly indicate that a foetus is not a person
- Shut your damn pie hole, Worf
- The power of the press
- What else should police officers be doing?
- Through the looking glass
- Beneath her
- Why the Liberals do not deserve your vote, in Tony Abbott’s words
- Words that hurt
- Supposed to be the adult
- Gina’s vogon poetry
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
Blog Roll
Also By Me
Were By Me:
- An Onymous Lefty (original at Blogspot - retired)
- The Blair/Bolt Watch Project (retired)
- Bolt Watch (retired)
- When Games Suck (unconscious)
Political/Personal Blogs
- Club Wah (Wah)
- HarrangueMan (Mikey)
- The Orstrahyun and Your New Reality (Darryl Mason)
- This is My Truth, Tell Me Yours (Keri James)
- What's This On My Hand (Jobe)
Non-Political Blogs
Recommended Podcasts
My Flickr



More PhotosDisclaimer
The contents of this blog are entirely fictional (and often ridiculous), intended only to amuse, or to provoke lively, non-libellous discussion. Any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental, even if they have the same names and are exactly alike in every respect except for a potentially defamatory one. Posts are written in character, not as Jeremy Sear (even the ones suspiciously marked "Jeremy"). Opinions expressed on the blog do not in any binding sense represent the views of any organisation of which the author is a member, or the views of the author himself, even when he says that they do (it'll be in character, you see?). Links to external sites should not be taken as endorsement of their content or views. The fact that this site is written in English is not intended to be construed as an insult to other world languages, all of which the author respects greatly, even the stupid ones that are bound to die out within a generation.Pages
Meta
@jeremysear
- Highly amused by journos who were claiming Gillard must call a ballot so the party can move on. Yeah right it will. 1 hour ago
- My god that's a spectacular collection of dumb on the http://t.co/3YksIXlH front page right now. They've outdone themselves. 2 hours ago
- LOL @abcnews "Stay informed with our live blog." 3 hours ago
- Media: government is imploding! We're in chaos! The country is doomed! In other news, business confidence has fallen. #hacks 3 hours ago
- As long as Labor and the media get it all out of their systems this weekend I guess I can put up with it. #auspol 5 hours ago
- An Onymous Lefty (original at Blogspot - retired)




Is that part of the “punishment” aspect of criminal sentencing? Or “deterrent”?
Also, something to consider next time the “bad people deserve bad” sheep next bleat about Law n Order
Cos popular culture is retarded.
And sometimes people deal with issues that make them very uncomftable by making jokes about them.
Concept of ‘less eligibility’?
As a society I don’t think we deal well with sexual assault at all. We demonise offenders and than wonder why the report rate is so low, given the offender is likely to know the victim (yes there are many other factors).
In Qld prisoners are briefed on sexual assault in their induction.
Ileum – are you serious? We “demonise” offenders? No effing way. We demonise VICTIMS, both in the law courts and the court of public opinion, and make excuses for why the man must be innocent and how it was all the fault of the shameless slut who was out at night/drunk/dressed like that (ie asking for it).
THAT is the real reason rape is underreported; it’s startlingly difficult to secure a conviction and the victim has to go through a second and third layer of torture, first by having to relive it to police and to lawyers and then to replay it all publicly in court, often in front of the perpetrator. Times that terror by ten when it is someone known to the victim and their friends/relatives are split over who is to blame.
I have, for some time, had a particular bugbear about prison rape, mostly because of the very casual way it seems to be dealt with both before and after the fact. I don’t believe, in any sort of civilised society, that we should blithely accept that rape is just “something” that happens in prisons. It is a heinous act of violence and degradation and should be treated with the appropriate gravity.
That our law makers, law enforcers and corrections staff seem to not give a flying you know what is of extreme concern. Violent anal rape should never ever be accepted as an expected “additional” punishment for ANYONE, let alone a drug addict or fine defaulter who, if they had been rich enough to afford a good lawyer, might not have been in prison in the first place.
That
Ileum – are you serious? We “demonise” offenders? No effing way. We demonise VICTIMS, both in the law courts and the court of public opinion, and make excuses for why the man must be innocent and how it was all the fault of the shameless slut who was out at night/drunk/dressed like that (ie asking for it).
Perhaps it’s a bit of both. The stigma attached to the offence means that offenders are far more likely to deny everything, and fight it out in court. I think physical assaults, for instance, are far more clear cut. Sexual assaults aren’t like the CSI tv shows, where teams of forensic scientists can work out the offender. Unless the offence is pretty recent, it’s basically one person’s word against another, and since sex offences are usually committed in secrecy, it’s extremely hard to generate solid proof.
You also have the complexities alluded to above. Not only is the offender likely to know the victim, they may well have spent weeks or months ‘grooming’ the victim, bribing them, etc, leaving the victim with the horrible and shameful feeling that they themselves are complicit in the abuse. Also, some offenders are of high-standing, well-liked, etc, so when victims come out, they may meet with disbelief or anger from those around them.
LH – I am serious but agree with most of what you say. There are many barriers to reporting but I thought as a society we had moved on from the – she asked for it – position (apart from a few league fans?).
I am only suggesting that there is a relationship between the way sex offenders are portrayed and the rate of reporting.
Pingback: Not Funny « Lost in a Forest